http://www.juliagorin.com/
*****UPDATE AT BOTTOM*****
As the son of Cuban exiles, junior Florida senator Marco Rubio should be particularly sensitive to attempts at painting a people as crazed criminals, often done in service of an underlying political agenda. But in his speech last week at the Jesse Helms Center in North Carolina, Senator Rubio said, “The American armed forces have been one of the greatest forces of good….They stopped Nazism and Communism and other evils such as Serbian ethnic cleansing.”
A year after our leaders lied to us in 1999 about the particularly insidious but ultimately mythical “Operation Horseshoe” (the ethnic cleansing plansubsequently shown to have been a Croatian-assisted concoction by a resurgentGermany delivering pa
In the Elian Gonzalez saga, the Cuban community was depicted as wild extremists and the Gonzalez family as “kidnappers” who were breaking the law, when they merely expected us to follow our own laws and give Elian due process. But the larger agenda was to deliver the boy back into Castro’s clutches, for reasons that remain mysterious to this day.
As with the Balkan wars, no one paid attention when, once the agenda was fulfilled, the truth came out. In the Gonzalez case, not only did Elian’s father Juan call ahead to tell the Miami relatives that Elian and his mother were coming, but he was speaking under duress when saying he wanted his son back in Cuba. He had also made his own attempts to leave Cuba. What caused the Cuban-Americas to go so “wild” was that word got out (but not to the wider American public) that Juan Gonzalez was seeking asylum for both himself and the boy. Most of this came out in a belatedly revealed INS memo that could have changed Elian’s fate but was ordered destroyed by then INS Commissioner Doris Meissner.
As appalling as a senator singling out one of the warring nationalities to perpetuate a long debunked lie about it, is the fact that by equalizing the fictitious ethnic cleansing with the Nazis, he reinforces the WWII inversions that we’ve been fed by the Serbs’ enemies — Croatians, Albanians and Bosniaks — all of whom sided withthe Axis powers. (This of course made it doubly important to paint the Serbs as the modern-day Nazis in the 90s, since it was their stubborn WWII resistance that delayed Hitler’s attack on Stalingrad, with decisive consequences.)
The Balkans are precisely an example of where America and its military were the opposite of “a force for good,” giving wings — and continued support today — to a state ruled by fear, with an elite that is above the law and where prosecution witnesses drop out or drop dead. A “Mafia society based on ‘capture of the state’ by criminal elements,” is how the Institute for European Policy put it in 2007. This was seconded by a Foreign Policy magazine article last February titled “Thug Life”: “It is difficult to see how democracy or respect [for] the rule of law could develop and flourish amid such overt displays of American support for a corrupt and criminal leadership…The [ethnic Albanian] war crimes…have never been fully investigated — in fact, in some cases they have been covered up.”
So it’s rather rich when Rubio cites Jesse Helms and Ronald Reagan as introducing a “‘morality in foreign policy’ plank to the 1976 Republican platform [which stated,] ‘The goal of Republican foreign policy is the achievement of liberty under law….’” This, while applauding a war which was achieved by the breaking or ignoring of every international law (and also without UN or even Congressional approval). A gratuitous war whose criminal spawn was born in likewise criminal fashion, without regard for the international order or any existing norms of state craft.
There are two iconic harbingers of the force against liberty that America risked becoming, and they came in back-to-back symbolic years at the turn of the millennium: the surreal sight in 1999 of the U.S. Air Force bombing Yugoslavian children in their beds, and in 2000 the image of a Federal agent’s machine gun fixed on a six-year-old boy in the arms of the fisherman who rescued him.
The free world was not there for Elian or his father, and it was downright murderous to the Orthodox Serbs. Some might even draw the connection that in one case, we betrayed a Catholic community on Easter in service to communism, and in the other we betrayed Orthodox Christians in favor of Islamic propaganda traceable to the Bosnian Ministry of Information and Albanian disseminators. (And no, we didn’t hold the bombs on Easter in that case either, though we do so on Ramadan.)
As a Jewish conservative who vigorously defended Cuban-Americans during the Elian siege (and was offended by the mainstream defamation of them), I am sickened that Senator Rubio would turn the same kind of spear — though far more elaborate and psychologically entrenched — onto another maligned people. I was always of the hope that if ever there were a swath of Americans who could be convinced of the disinformation campaign perpetrated against the truly besieged Serbs, it was Cubans. Shame on you, Senator Rubio.
UPDATE:
Below are some relevant items about the Free World attacking Christians on Easter. Bombing Serbs on Easter had its precedent in history. Hitler bombed Serbia on Easter 1941. Germans wrote “Frohe Ostern” (”Happy Easter”) on the bombs they dropped on Serbian women and children.
Below are some relevant items about the Free World attacking Christians on Easter. Bombing Serbs on Easter had its precedent in history. Hitler bombed Serbia on Easter 1941. Germans wrote “Frohe Ostern” (”Happy Easter”) on the bombs they dropped on Serbian women and children.
This fact was not lost on our victims. Fast-forward to 1999:
Yugoslav Deputy Prime Minister, Vuk Draskovic, condemned the Nato attack as “a crime against the Serbian nation'’.“Downtown Belgrade is on fire on the biggest Christian day of Easter,'’ he told the British satellite station Sky. ‘’The last time Belgrade was on fire [over] Easter was in 1941 when Hitler bombed it.”
The Harrier Hawks, which are housed in huge white tent-hangars, carry 1,000lb bombs covered with graffiti, some of which was less than friendly: “Happy Easter” and “Hope you like it!”
– The Independent, March 26, 1999
I must tell you, Mr. Clinton, I was deeply saddened when I heard reports that NATO forces have written “Happy Easter” on some of the bombs dropped over Yugoslavia.
It is interesting to note that the Clinton administration in the winter of 1998-1999 stopped its brief bombing campaign on Iraq due to the period of Ramadan on the Islamic calendar. However, both English and American warplanes continued to bomb the Serbian Christians throughout the Christian Holy Week and especially on Easter Sunday of the Orthodox Christian calendar. Some of the bombs that were dropped by English pilots had the message painted on them, “Happy Easter.”
– Metropolitan Isaiah of Denver, March 24, 2002
The other grievance was who Nato was targeting. From the foreign broadcasts (CNN, SKY, BBC) the message came across loud and clear — we have no quarrel with the people of Serbia, only with the president and the army. So why, asked the people of Serbia, did you have to bomb over Easter, one of the most holy periods in the Serb calendar, as the Nazis had done in 1941? Why did we find an unexploded bomb with the words “Happy Easter” engraved, if you were on the side of the “people?”
– Unknown Questioner
Throughout May, Nato repeatedly targeted the town of Kraljevo, destroying its school and a hospital clinic. More than 20 civilians have been injured. A message on one of the bomb casings found at Kraljevo read, “Do You Still Want to Be a Serb Now?”
– “Who NATO Killed,” by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair, June 15, 1999
It is one of the most underreported aspects of the bloody wars that have taken place in the Balkans: the same Clinton administration that now professes concern about the Kosovo refugee crisis promoted a similar crisis almost four years ago. In August 1995, the Clinton administration supported the Croatian Army when it drove hundreds of thousands of Serbs from Krajina…?A major war was averted when Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic, who is now demonized as a new Hitler, failed to send his army to defend the Krajina Serbs, who had set up an independent mini-state. The U.N. says the Croatian attack included the shelling and burning of Serb villages and the bombing of refugees. The War Crimes Tribunal in the Hague is gathering evidence to determine if the Croats should be charged with war crimes. The U.S. has been slow to supply satellite images that have been requested by the prosecutors.Walter Roberts, a retired foreign service officer, said in an April 10 column in the Washington Post, “The pictures from the borders of Kosovo have outraged the whole world. But where was the outrage when more than 300,000 Serbs were evicted by the Croatian government from the Krajina, a Croatian land inhabited by Serbs for centuries?”Footage of Krajina Serbs loading what possessions they could onto wagons had been shown on TV, but there were no touching interviews with pathetic Serb refugees telling tales of woe in the refugee camps where many of them have lived for nearly five years. On May 5, President Clinton, addressing our troops in Germany, declared, “We have no quarrel with the Serb people….Our quarrel is with ethnic cleansing.” That was not the position he took when the Serbs were driven from Krajina.
– Reed Irvine, Accuracy in Media, May 1999
“What the former communist Vuk Draskovic was not telling the truth about,” wrote “Serbstvo,” whose research most of this last segment is, “was the last time Serbia was bombed on Easter. It was in fact Serbia’s own allies that carpet-bombed her in service to Communism, and they chose to do it on Easter Sunday of 1944. The Nazis and Allies bombed Belgrade over Easter, which is regarded as the holiest day by Orthodox Christians. Serbs would gather in greater numbers for Easter Sunday Mass than they would on any other day of the year. The Germans, British and Americans took advantage of knowing that bombing Serbs over Easter would inflict the maximum amount of civilian casualties. The Allies showed they were as cynical as the Nazis and also wrote ‘Happy Easter’ on the bombs.”
The city of Belgrade was bombed during two campaigns in World War II, the first undertaken by the Luftwaffe in 1941, and the latter by Allied air forces in 1944…Belgrade was bombed by Anglo-American air forces on April 16 and 17, 1944, which was Orthodox Easter Day. The most important unit that took part was American 15th Air Force, based in Foggia in the south of Italy. This carpet bombing raid was executed by 600 bombers flying at high altitude.
[The] bombing of Belgrade on Easter Sunday 1944 was deliberate — UXO was found with [the] inscription “Happy Easter” written in Serbian. According to flight documents, bombers were heading to Romania, but UXO shows otherwise. [Belgrade’s] city core was deliberately targeted, more than
2000 civilians were killed while the damage to occupying Wehrmacht forces was negligent (several dead and wounded)
– Comment Poster on FreeRepublic.com, Sept. 22, 2004
The Allies claimed Serbia was bombed for the purpose of destroying German occupying troops, but what association did Germans have with an Orthodox holiday and why were only several Germans killed compared to the thousands of Serbian civilians? How was bombing churches filled with Christian believers in Easter Mass supposed to harm the Nazis? How were they killing Germans if they were targeting churches, schools and hospitals?
– Serbstvo
It was supposed to break down the Germans but actually had destroyed Belgrade more than the German bombs. On some found bombs, it was written in Serbian Cyrillic “Happy Easter.”
– eNotes
[The] campaign of bombing civilian buildings, hospitals, bridges and residential quarters was carried out without permission of the UN Security Council and is one of the major crimes at the end of the XX century. Belgrade was bombed three times more during the same century: in 1914 by Austrians and Germans, in 1941 by Hitler and in 1944 by the British Royal Air Force (on Easter day) - Serbia forgives but will never forget.
Serbstvo closes with a note on Allied support for the communist takeover of Yugoslavia:
Churchill promised Tito would rule over a communist Yugoslavia. He was aware that Tito’s communist movement was not popular in Serbia (as far as Serbs went, his army was mostly composed of Bosnian and Krajina Serbs) as [those] in Serbia mostly favored Draza’s Chetniks, who were both anti-fascist and anti-communist in defense of the Monarchy. The Allies realized that the only way they could bring Tito to seize power in Yugoslavia was by crushing the Ravna Gora Movement and terrorizing civilians through carpet-bombing.
The Allies ensured that Yugoslavia would be communist after WWII, and once we defeated the Nazis we adopted many of them and proceeded to actualize parts ofHitler’s vision of the world — ostensibly to defeat Communism. So when Rubio invokes American opposition to Nazism, Communism and Serbs, let’s keep in mind that only one of those oppositions by us was full-hearted — and it wasn’t either of the first two. Unless we’re talking specifically about Ronald Reagan who — incidentally — knew the value of a Serb. Also while pondering that list — Nazism, Communism, and Serbs — let’s keep in mind that, heartbreakingly, the U.S. and her NATO allies have more in common with Nazi Germany than most would be willing to admit.
______________________________
Supplied by BBC Worldwide Monitoring
January 16, 1999, Saturday
YUGOSLAV COMMENTATOR DETAILS CIA "SECRET OPERATIONS"
SOURCE: RTS SAT TV, Belgrade, in Serbo-Croat 1830 gmt 15 Jan 99
LENGTH: 1323 words
Text of report by Serbian TV
Commentary by Milovan Drecun - recorded So-called unconventional activity plays the role of an advance guard for the US's policy of conquering the world. Secret operations, planned, financed and carried out by the US intelligence services, have a central place in this activity. The CIA, which employs 20,000 people and spends an annual 1.5bn dollars, and the military intelligence service DIA, are the main organizers of this activity. These two services are part of the US intelligence community which encompasses 25 institutions, organizations and agencies, which are all supervised by the National Security Council.
The CIA's subversive activity in Eastern European countries, based on the so-called consortium of well-known experts for secret activities, was defined in the early eighties, when Ronald Reagan became president. Such an activity in the then-Yugoslavia is contained in Reagan's statement, made during his campaign, that Yugoslavia had to be won over either in its entirety or in parts. Secret activities carried out by the CIA, independent of US official diplomacy, in countries defined as targets, are being carried out in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, whose defence of its national interests and territorial integrity is an obstacle to American hegemony in the Balkans. The CIA carries out its secret operations and actions through its agency, but also through other channels, mediators and institutions which cooperate and are based in the targeted countries. The CIA 's outposts abroad work under the supervision of regional directorates for operations in almost all countries in the world, as a rule are stationed in US diplomatic missions. The CIA's officers use diplomatic status to conceal their activities and diplomatic immunity for protection.
The goal of the CIA's secret operations modelled on the so-called (Bissell) philosophy is the instalment of a puppet regime in the targeted country. If it is not successful in installing its man at the helm of the state, the CIA conducts secret operations in various domains of a given society, specifically, the social, political and economic domains. It does this by winning over the leaders of opposition parties, by influencing public opinion, creating an agency for the so-called independent media, compromising prominent personalities from political and public life and by maintaining secret ties with the so-called underground forces such as the terrorists in Kosmet Kosovo and Metohija .
The CIA has tried for years to establish illegal outposts in countries that have an important strategic position. These outposts are established in the host country without the knowledge of the official US state institutions, and they rely on the representatives of companies, banks, commercial enterprises. The CIA has frequently influenced the internal conditions of development in various countries through covert actions, special operations, and measures of so-called low intensity warfare.
The CIA's secret activity in Serbia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia FRY is proven by a statement made by then Secretary of State Baker who said in 1991 that Serbia had to be pared down to pre-Kumanovo borders, and also by Congress's foreign affairs committee which in 1992 concluded that Kosmet had to be activated whenever there was a need to win concessions from Serbia. The instruments which the CIA uses to achieve the defined goals of US policy, specifically, the breaking up of Serbia and the FRY, and the installation of a puppet regime, are secret activities to activate and support nationalist and separatist forces in Kosmet, Raska, Vojvodina, and Montenegro, the promotion of ideological and political differences and conflicts with the aim of destroying national unity and provoking a civil war in Serbia, and the provoking of social tension and unrest through economic sanctions.
The CIA is particularly active on the psychological and propaganda plan and in the media. According to renowned US writer (Sean Jervassy), propaganda and psychological warfare is waged by US governmental organizations through the information agency which employs 9,000 people including the Voice of America, mass media with which the governments of Western countries maintain ownership relations, financial aid, and officials installed by the agency. The CIA promotes secret propaganda, as do other intelligence services with the CIA's approval. These operations consist of two phases: the establishment of a network of agents and organizations, and the operative phase of promoting special purposes propaganda. The CIA has for years been funding its helpers, among which the media, which comes up, elaborates and promotes the ideas, has a particular place. There is no doubt that the CIA is conducting secret operations in Kosmet. These operations are coordinated with Hill's shuttle diplomacy and with official US policy with the aim of supporting terrorists, provoking destabilization in Kosmet, and creating conditions for the deployment of NATO forces.
CIA operatives in Albania are engaged in this activity. According to Albanian secret service chief Fatos Klosi, these operatives are stationed in northern Albania. Fatos Klosi claims that the CIA has for years maintained offices in northern Albania, surveillance centres for Yugoslavia, and a drone centre. The conference on Kosovo and the Balkans, held behind closed doors in New York in December 1993, attests to the fact that these activities have been going on for some time . The conference was organized by the council for international relations and the Carnegie Foundation for International Peace. Morton Abramowitz was the president of the foundation; at the beginning of the destruction of former Yugoslavia, Abramowitz was tasked with research and intelligence operations in the State Department. At the conference, speaking on behalf of the council for international relations, (Leslie Gelb) advised Clinton to arm the Albanians in Kosovo.
It is worth noting that the New York Times reported on the CIA's secret activities at the end of March 1997. Congress routinely approves millions of dollars which are routed through secret and public channels and are used to exert political influence and to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, the New York Times reported. In addition to the CIA, which has been engaged in this secret activity a full 50 years, Congress and special institutions also formed the National Fund for Democracy which does the job openly. The fund was established 15 years ago, and it directly provides political parties, trade unions, dissidents, and the so-called independent media in foreign countries with an annual 30 million dollars, the New York Times reported.
An article by Warren Zimmerman, former US Ambassador to the FRY, published in US newspapers, best illustrates how the CIA influences the media and consequently the Serbian people. While posted in Belgrade, Zimmerman coordinated the CIA's secret activities in the area. Zimmerman writes in his article that the majority of Serbs think within the framework of absurd, racist stereotypes. Zimmerman came to this conclusion on the basis of a survey carried out in January by the Open Society Institute, the so-called prominent human rights organization sponsored by the US financier George Soros. The survey was to find out how the Serbs see themselves and others. The results showed that the Serbs see themselves as hard-working, intelligent, courteous, sincere, honest, pure, generous, peace-loving, and well-intentioned towards other nations, proud, and hospitable people. That is why Zimmerman concluded that the Serbs think within the framework of absurd, racist stereotypes. In other words, the CIA does not allow the Serbian people to have a good and positive opinion of themselves. Even coming from the CIA, it is too much.
COMPANY: NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL (57%); NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL (57%);
GEOGRAPHIC: UNITED STATES (94%); SERBIA (94%);
LOAD-DATE: March 30, 1999
LANGUAGE: English
Copyright 1999 British Broadcasting Corporation
No comments:
Post a Comment